Legal Opinion
Palm Springs S. & S. Inc. v. Bering
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 19, 1963No. Civ. No. 7025PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, P. J.
In this action on a promissory note for $20,000 and to foreclose a chattel mortgage, the court, on motion of plaintiff on February 16, 1961, entered a summary judgment in full on the note and foreclosed a chattel mortgage on certain bar and kitchen equipment located in Palm Springs as to all defendants except W. W. Wooldridge.
On February 24, 1961, on the court’s own motion, the summary judgment was corrected to add thereto that if the proceeds of the sale of the items secured by the chattel mortgage were insufficient to pay the amount found due to plaintiff with interest, etc., the plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Figari v. OlceseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Rivera v. CappaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
- Security-First National Bank v. ChapmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Rodes v. ShannonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
- Harper v. FrenchCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- American Guaranty Corp. v. StoodyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- PLM, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PACourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988