Wis. Bell, Inc. v. Labor & Indus. Review Comm'n
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel Kelly, J.
¶1 Charles E. Carlson says Wisconsin Bell, Inc. intentionally discriminated against him when it terminated his employment because of his disability. Using the "inference method" of finding discriminatory intent, LIRC agreed and concluded that Wisconsin Bell violated the Wisconsin Fair Employment Act ("WFEA"). See Wis. Stat. ch. 111, subchapter II (2015-16). 1
¶2 We granted Wisconsin Bell's petition for review to determine whether LIRC's version of the "inference method" impermissibly allows imposition of WFEA liability without proof of discriminatory intent, and if so, whether that is…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Harnischfeger Corp. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Tetra Tech EC, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of RevenueWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
- Stern v. Thompson & Coates, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- Stores v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
- Crystal Lake Cheese Factory v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Cree, Inc. v. LIRCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
- Bakkestuen v. Lepke Holdings LLCCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019
- Friendly Village Nursing and Rehab, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce DevelopmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
- Friendly Village Nursing and Rehab, LLC v. State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce DevelopmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
- Abby Windows, LLC v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2025
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.