Legal Opinion

Park National Bank & Trust of Chicago v. Paul (In Re Paul)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided September 14, 2001No. 19-02419PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

JACK B. SCHMETTERER, Bankruptcy Judge.

Park National Bank (“Park”) seeks to prevent Ronald Paul (“Debtor”) from discharging a debt ($15,239.82) for overdrawn checks on Debtor’s corporate checking account. Park argues that the debt is non-dischargeable under the fraud and willful damage to property exceptions of 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) and (a)(6), respectively. As a result of Debtor’s default and entry of Default Order, Park moved for judgment on its Adversary Complaint. The Court now makes and enters its Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law based on…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Kawaauhau v. GeigerSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. In Re: Seymour Markowitz, Debtor. Seymour Markowitz v. Carolyn CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Deady v. Hanson (In Re Hanson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  2. Rae v. Scarpello (In Re Scarpello)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2002
  3. Jou v. Adalian (In re Adalian)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Zamora v. Jacobs (In Re Jacobs)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  5. John Deere Co. v. Broholm (In Re Broholm)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API