Legal Opinion

Catanzano v. Hydinger

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 15, 1936No. 6 Div. 920PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is a suit in equity; its nature and purpose and the equitable principles on which it is founded are treated on a former appeal from decree on demurrer. Catanzano et al. v. Hydinger, 228 Ala. 547, 154 So. 588.

After an answer was filed, the court heard the cause in which the witnesses were examined in open court, and made a final decree, in which appellants were given the privilege of performing that certain alleged covenant in the contract assumed by them of “grading and graveling the streets and making electric current and city water available in the streets and alleys…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lowery v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Elliott v. HowisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1906
  3. Worthington & Co. v. GwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  4. Aday v. EcholsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1850
  5. Walker v. CloseSupreme Court of Florida · 1929

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. KendrickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  2. Alabama Butane Gas Co. v. Tarrant Land Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. Health Science Products, Inc. v. Taylor (In Re Health Science Products, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
  4. Ray v. BrewerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Schock v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API