State v. Garcia-Trujillo
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.
A witness may not testify to the content of another’s extrajudicial statement if the testimony is based on a translation rather than the witness’s understanding of the declarant’s words unless the testimony is not offered for the truth of the matter asserted or the interpreter is an agent of the declarant. Manuel Garcia-Trujillo (Garcia) contends the trial court improperly admitted rebuttal testimony by the investigating detective about a statement Garcia made through an interpreter. The State cross-appeals, arguing that the trial court improperly excluded other testimony by the same…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Jaleh NazemianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- State v. WhelchelWashington Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. Hugo Lopez, Juan Trujillo and Hernando VasquezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Antonios KoskeridesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- State v. HuynhCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Correa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. MoralesWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Saavedra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2009
- State v. Gonzalez-HernandezCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Correa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.