Legal Opinion

Jack Daniel Distillery, Lem Motlow Prop., Inc. v. Olsen

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1986PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COOPER, Justice.

The issue in this appeal is whether the filing of a complaint attacking the legality of tax rates within six months of the first payment of the tax made under protest is sufficient to recover all subsequent assessments paid under protest. The chancellor held that it was not, that payment for each tax period was the basis for a separate action and that suit for the recovery of each tax payment must be filed within the time allowed by T.C.A. § 67-1-903. We agree.

This action was filed on February 18, 1981. In the original complaint, the plaintiff alleged that the local…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lyons v. LayTennessee Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Griffith Motors, Inc. v. KingTennessee Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. Delinquent Taxpayers as Shown on 1972 Real Property Delinquent Tax Records of the Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Dominion National Bank v. OlsenTennessee Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Bowater North America Corp. v. JacksonTennessee Supreme Court · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. SunTrust Bank, Nashville v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  2. Roberts v. Sullivan County (In Re Penking Trust)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1996
  3. Stewart Title Guaranty Co. v. McReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1994
  4. Deroyal v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998
  5. Suntrust Bank v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API