Legal Opinion
Chamblin v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 5, 2001No. C 99-2599 JLPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S SECOND AND FOURTH CAUSES OF ACTION
LARSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs second and fourth claims was heard on June 18, 2001. Brian P. Evans appeared on behalf of Plaintiff Keith Cham-blin. Bruce P. Loper appeared on behalf of Defendant Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company.
Plaintiffs complaint alleges four causes of action: 1) Recovery of Policy Benefits, 2) Breach of Fiduciary Duty, 3) Declaratory Relief, and 4) Tortious Breach of Insurance Contract (bad faith).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Pilot Life Insurance v. DedeauxSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
- Gruenberg v. Aetna InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hollaway v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Pachuta v. Unumprovident Corp.District Court, D. Hawaii · 2002
- Gray v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2019
- Hollaway v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003