Legal Opinion
Dandridge v. Marshall
Supreme Court of Virginia
Decided April 23, 2004No. Record 031457PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lacy
Jonathan R. Dandridge filed a personal injury action against Albert R. Marshall seeking damages of $300,000. In this appeal, Dandridge asserts that due to the trial court’s error in three of its evidentiary rulings, the jury awarded him only $15,000. For the reasons we state below, we will remand the case for a new trial on damages because the trial court erred in excluding certain testimony and allowing other testimony.
Facts
On December 5, 1999, Dandridge and Marshall were involved in an automobile accident. An ambulance service transported Dandridge, complaining of nausea, blurred vision,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McMunn v. TatumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- Lombard v. RohrbaughSupreme Court of Virginia · 2001
- Washington-Virginia Railway Co. v. DeahlSupreme Court of Virginia · 1919
- Spence v. MillerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1955
- Breeding, Adm'r v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Thomas v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2005
- Juniper v. Com.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2006
- Burns v. GagnonSupreme Court of Virginia · 2012
- Commonwealth v. ProffittSupreme Court of Virginia · 2016
- Caison v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.