Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Berrien County Michigan
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided September 3, 2020No. 3:19-cv-00106Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION SAMANTHA JOHNSON, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:19-cv-106 DRL-MGG BERRIEN COUNTY MICHIGAN et al., Defendants. OPINION & ORDER For reasons still unknown, despite two show cause orders, Samantha Johnson hasn’t complied with all court orders or rules. The defendants, treated together here as Berrien County, have filed a second motion to dismiss for her failure to prosecute the case under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). The court set a show cause hearing and parallel hearing under Rule 16, but Ms. Johnson never…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- County of Sacramento v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Mark A. Ball v. City of Chicago and Alfred S. Schultz, Individually and as Agent of the City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Sharp Electronics Corp. v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.