Legal Opinion

State v. Modest

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 14, 2001No. 19577-5-IIIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchultheis, J.

Walter Anthony Modest appeals his amended judgment and sentence, contending that his right to a speedy resentencing hearing was violated. Claiming that the more than two-year delay between remand and resentencing was purposeful and/or oppressive, he asks this court to set aside the judgment and sentence and dismiss with prejudice the charges against him. Because the trial court properly denied his motion for release, we affirm.

FACTS

Mr. Modest was charged with 13 crimes, all related to a prostitution enterprise in Yakima County. He pleaded guilty to counts 1 through 5 and was found guilty of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pollard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State v. RupeWashington Supreme Court · 1987

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. AmosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. State v. AmosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. State v. ModestCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. State Of Washington, V Bruce Eli BrattonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  5. State Of Washington v. Chris Marion McnicholasCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API