R.J. Land, Inc. v. Town of Mamakating
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtStein, J.
*1005Initially, we concur with respondents that the instant proceeding was untimely. Town of Mamakating Code § 199-64 (G) provides that “[a]ny applicant who disputes any fee statement presented to him [or her] may bring a proceeding in the Supreme Court . . . pursuant to [CPLR article 78], within 30 days after presentation of such disputed fee statement.” We disagree with Supreme Court’s determination that the term “fee statement” is inapplicable to a bill for general building department fees, such as those charged by respondents here.2 Although respondents did not provide a copy of the fee…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Peckham v. CalogeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
- Eastern Niagara Project Power Alliance v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Finch, Pruyn & Co v. MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of Clean Air Coalition of W. N.Y., Inc. v. New York State Pub. Serv. CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026