Legal Opinion

R.J. Land, Inc. v. Town of Mamakating

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 2, 2012PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStein, J.

*1005Initially, we concur with respondents that the instant proceeding was untimely. Town of Mamakating Code § 199-64 (G) provides that “[a]ny applicant who disputes any fee statement presented to him [or her] may bring a proceeding in the Supreme Court . . . pursuant to [CPLR article 78], within 30 days after presentation of such disputed fee statement.” We disagree with Supreme Court’s determination that the term “fee statement” is inapplicable to a bill for general building department fees, such as those charged by respondents here.2 Although respondents did not provide a copy of the fee…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Peckham v. CalogeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2009
  2. Eastern Niagara Project Power Alliance v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  3. Finch, Pruyn & Co v. MillsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Clean Air Coalition of W. N.Y., Inc. v. New York State Pub. Serv. CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API