Legal Opinion
Peckham v. Calogero
New York Court of Appeals
Decided May 5, 2009PublishedCited by 274 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Jones, J.
Respondent Chelsea Partners, LLC (Owner) owns a three-story, 40-foot-deep building with a basement and eight residential units in Manhattan. Petitioner Daniel Peckham, the sole remaining occupant of the building, resides in an apartment subject to the Rent Stabilization Law and Code.
In May 2004, Owner filed an “Owner’s Application for Order Granting Approval to Refuse Renewal of [Petitioner’s] Lease and/or to Proceed for Eviction” (application) with the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR). Owner plans to demolish the building and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kurcsics v. Merchants Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Gilman v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Matter of Yonkers Gardens Co. v. State of New York Div. of Hous. & Cmty. RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Peckham v. CalogeroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Mahoney v. AltmanNew York Supreme Court · 1970
3Cited by274 opinions
- Gersten v. 56 7th Avenue LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Wooley v. New York State Department of Correctional ServicesNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Ward v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Murphy v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 2013
- Terrace Court, LLC v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 2012
269 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.