Legal Opinion

Dodge Mfg. Co. v. Ohio Valley Pulley Works

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky

Decided May 1, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUIITON, Circuit Judge.

1. This is a suit for infringement of several patents, all owned by the complainant company. The patents alleged by the hill to he infringed are (a) the Sanborn patent, of April 17, 1883, No. 275,917; (b) the McNeal patent, of October 19, 1886, No. 351,081; (c) the Philion patent, of August 16, 1887, No. 368,190; (d) the Dodge patent of July 28, 1891, No. 156,722. The subject-matter of all the pateuts is pulleys and their manufacture. The complainant has dismissed its hill so far as infringement of the Sanborn patent was charged, and so far as infringement of claims 1,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. MedartSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Wells Glass Co. v. HendersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1895
  3. Dodge v. Ohio Valley Pulley WorksU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1899

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dodge Mfg. Co. v. CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1901
  2. Eisenstein v. FibigerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API