Legal Opinion

Scott v. Harber

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 21, 1961No. 41,977PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Price, J.:

This is an action to recover for personal injuries and related damage arising out of a collision of motor vehicles. Plaintiff recovered a judgment against defendant, Dunbar Kapple, Inc., and that defendant has appealed.

For reasons presently to be stated, no useful purpose would be served by setting forth the many contentions advanced by the parties to this appeal. It suffices to say that one of the justices of this corut is disqualified to participate in the case, and that following a careful and extended conference regarding its disposition…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rice v. Sioux City Memorial Park Cemetery, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Rice v. Sioux City Memorial Park Cemetery, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Ward v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  4. State Ex Rel. Wilson v. HolsmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953
  5. Blasi v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Paulsen v. Unified School District No. 368Supreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  2. Thornton v. ShoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
  3. Tramill v. HollandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API