Legal Opinion

Tramill v. Holland

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 19, 1972No. 46,478PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

This action steins from a motor vehicle collision occurring in Pittsburg, Kansas. The plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant and the latter has appealed.

No useful purpose would be served by setting forth the various contentions raised on appeal. It is sufficient to say that one of the members of this court is disqualified to participate in the appeal because of his prior connection with the case, and the remaining six members are equally divided as to how the appeal should be decided.

Article 3, § 2(a) of the Kansas Constitution provides that the concurrence of four justices is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ward v. DavisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1955
  2. Scott v. HarberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bland v. ScottSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
  2. Mobil Oil Corp. v. Fairfax Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Goodwin v. Kansas Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API