Legal Opinion

Labell v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 16, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBuford, J.

A bill was filed to foreclose a mortgage. From a decree in that case an appeal was taken. The appeal was dismissed. A second appeal was taken in which an order of supersedeas was entered, a part of which order was as follows:

“IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the condition of the bond be such that the Principals and the Sureties shall stipulate and agree in the said bond, that in the event the final decree appealed from shall be affirmed or said appeal shall be dismissed, that all damages sustained or occasioned thereby may be assessed and determined by the chancery court in the same cause from…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crawford v. KirkseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Davis v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Davis v. VirgesWashington Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Grunewald v. West Coast Grocery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Henry v. Great Northern Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Orlando Orange Groves Co. v. HaleSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Knott, as TreasurerSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  3. All Florida Surety Company v. VannDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1961
  4. A. D. Lawson & Columbia Casualty Co. v. County Board of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  5. Kleinman v. Bal Harbour Towers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API