Legal Opinion
Mujaddid v. Wehling
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided October 12, 2016No. 16-1220PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION *
2Per curiam
Pro se appellant El Aemer El Mujaddid (“Mujaddid”) appeals from the judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in his civil rights case. As the appeal does not present a substantial question, we will summarily affirm the District Court’s decision.
I
This case stems from a police raid in New Jersey. Mujaddid, while a guest in someone else’s home, was awakened, searched, arrested, and charged with several crimes in Cumberland County Court. His case was moved to Vineland Municipal Court, and the charges were eventually dropped. Mujaddid has sought recourse…
3Cases cited16 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Michael Malik Allah v. Thomas SeiverlingCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- BARTLEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- BARTLEY v. STATE OF NEW JERSEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2019
- BELL v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021
- BYRD v. FINLEYDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- COUSAR v. MORGANDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.