Legal Opinion

Wise v. Rosenblatt

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided January 5, 1891PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from eleventh district court. Action by Leopold Wise and Charles Wise against William Rosenblatt, to recover an alleged,balance of advances made upon a consignment of merchandise. Plaintiffs appeal from a judgment for defendant dismissing the complaint and for the amount of a counter-claim. For former report, see 9 N. Y. Supp. 500.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The facts of this case, so far as they are apparent from the record before us, are, briefly stated, as follows: Plaintiffs were auctioneers and commission merchants in the city of New York, under the firm name of L. & C. Wise. About March 20, 1889, the defendant consigned to the plaintiffs 825 pairs of shoes for sale, upon which plaintiffs agreed to make advances. These advances appear to have been made in three installments, amounting in the aggregate to $655. For each of these installments the defendant, at the request of plaintiffs, signed and delivered a receipt in the following words:…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Chapin v. . DobsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Brigg v. . HiltonNew York Court of Appeals · 1885
  3. Routledge v. . Worthington Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890
  4. Van Brunt v. . DayNew York Court of Appeals · 1880

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Fuld v. KahnNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API