Legal Opinion

Fuld v. Kahn

New York Court of Common Pleas

Decided August 9, 1893PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from seventh district court. Action by Sigmund Fuld against Abraham Kahn. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

Plaintiff sued to recover the sum of $50, the alleged agreed compensation of his assignor for services which the latter claimed to have performed at defendant’s request. Defendant denied the making of such agreement, and the justice below gave judgment for plaintiff for $25. It is obvious that the judgment is not consistent with the facts in evidence, and so should be reversed. Wise v. Rosenblatt, (Com. Pl. N. Y.) 9 N. Y. Supp. 500, and 12 N. Y. Supp. 288. The determination of the controversy rested in the conflicting contentions of the parties. Crediting the statements of plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Romeyn v. SicklesNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  2. Wise v. RosenblattNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1891

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Alden v. Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  2. Bressler v. McVeySupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Apperson-Lee Motor Co. v. RingSupreme Court of Virginia · 1928
  4. Metz v. Campbell Printing-Press & Manuf'g Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  5. Pionier v. AlexanderNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API