Legal Opinion
Santora v. Town of Poughkeepsie Zoning Board of Appeals
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 14, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*742In a hybrid proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to review two determinations of the Town of Poughkeepsie Zoning Board of Appeals, both dated June 14, 2006, which, after a hearing, granted the application of Oakwood Partners, LLC, for area variances, and action for a judgment declaring, inter alia, that the re-zoning as adopted in Local Law No. 17 of 2005 of the Town of Poughkeepsie by resolution of the Town Board of the Town of Poughkeepsie, dated December 14, 2005, constituted illegal spot zoning, the petitioners/plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Fuhst v. FoleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Ifrah v. UtschigNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
- Citineighbors Coalition of Historic Carnegie Hill v. New York City Landmarks Preservation CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Cohen v. KrantzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Smith v. Board of AppealsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ass'n for Community Living, Inc. v. New York State Office of Mental HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Quinn v. 20 E. Clinton, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
- Matter of Gidney v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Matter of Gidney v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022