Legal Opinion

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Matukas

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 26, 1915No. 2644PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Pottawatomie County; Roy Hoffman, Judge. Action by Peter Matukas, an infant, by Frances Ma-tukas, his mother and next friend, against the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

On December 31,-1909, in the district court of Pottawattomie county, Peter Matukas, an infant, by his mother as next friend, sued, the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company, plaintiff in error, in damages for personal injuries. After a general demurrer to the petition was filed and overruled, and issues' joined by answer and reply, there was trial to a jury and judgment for plaintiff for $8,000, and defendant brings the case here. It is first assigned that The court erred in overruling the demurrer to the petition. The petition, after alleging the corporate existence of defendant,…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. RahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. East Tennessee Coal Co. v. DanielTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Kiff v. . YoumansNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  5. Kline v. Cent. Pac. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1869

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dyal v. NortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  2. St. Louis & S. F. R. Co. v. BoushSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. WattsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Shawnee-Tecumseh Traction Co. v. NewcomeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API