Legal Opinion
Michilin Prosperity Co. v. Fellowes Manufacturing Co.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 30, 2006No. Civil Action 04-1025(RWR)(JMF)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, District Judge.
Michilin Prosperity Co. (“Michilin”) alleges that the POWERSHRED PS70-2CD distributed by Fellowes Manufacturing Co. (“Fellowes”) infringes United States Patent No. 6,550,701 (“the '701 patent”) under the doctrine of equivalents. The parties submitted claim interpretation memoranda, and a hearing was held in accordance with Markman v. Westview, 517 U.S. 370, 116 S.Ct. 1384, 134 L.Ed.2d 577 (1996), to construe the disputed terms of the '701 patent claims. Consistent with the patent claims, the specification and extrinsic evidence…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Johnson & Johnston Associates Inc. v. R.E. Service Co., Inc. And Mark FraterCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Chef America, Inc. v. Lamb-Weston, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Genentech, Inc. v. Chiron CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Intex Recreation Corp. v. Team Worldwide Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Zircon Corp. v. Stanley WorksDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010