Legal Opinion

Zircon Corp. v. Stanley Works

District Court, N.D. California

Decided May 14, 2010No. C-09-0042-EDLPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER CONSTRUING CLAIM TERM AND GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT

ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendant The Stanley Works (“Stanley”) moves for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement of Plaintiff Zircon Corporation’s (“Zircon”) U.S. Patent No. 7,116,091 (the “'091 Patent”), which discloses a device for “ratiometric stud sensing.” The parties agree that the entire matter may potentially be decided as a matter of law based on application of the properly construed claim term “ratio” to the accused device. Defendant also contends that summary judgment…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
  5. Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. HSM Portfolio LLC v. Elpida Memory Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API