Legal Opinion
Billy Joe Hudson v. Samuel Lewis Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 12, 1994No. 93-16924Published
1Opinion of the Court
24 F.3d 246
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Billy Joe HUDSON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Samuel LEWIS; Attorney General, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 93-16924.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted April 12, 1994.*
Decided May 12, 1994.
Before: FLETCHER, FERGUSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges.
1
MEMORANDUM**
2
Billy Joe Hudson appeals pro se the district court's…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Harris v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.