Legal Opinion

State v. McCain

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 19, 1978No. 7826SC779PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Harry C.), Judge.

Counsel for appellant failed to include in the record on appeal the order of the trial court overruling defendant’s objection to the in-court identification of defendant. This is in violation of Rule 9(b)(3) (viii) and (x) of the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. These rules are mandatory. The defendant appellant has the duty to see that the record on appeal is properly made up. State v. Stubbs, 265 N.C. 420, 144 S.E. 2d 262 (1965); State v. Byrd, 4 N.C. App. 672, 167 S.E. 2d 522 (1969). Defendant does include in the record on appeal a statement that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Manson v. BrathwaiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MitchellTennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  3. State v. CoplenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. State v. PennellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API