Legal Opinion

Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad v. Dunbar

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1880PublishedCited by 18 opinions

Agreed case from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. John A. Jameson, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Dickey

Application is made for an order to dismiss these proceedings from this court. The determination of this application turns upon the question whether a franchise is involved in this case. By the act of 1879, all cases in which a franchise is involved must be taken directly to the Supreme Court. (Laws 1879, p. 222.)

Dunbar and Valentine filed a bill in chancery, in the Superior Court of Cook county, against the Chicago and Western Indiana Railroad Company and others, and procured a decree enjoining the defendants in that court from bringing the railroad of that company within the limits of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Attorney General v. Utica InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  2. People ex rel. Bardill v. HoltzIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Board of Trade v. People ex rel. SturgesIllinois Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Abbott v. New York & New England RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Street R. R. v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Martens v. People ex rel. SearleIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Winne v. People ex rel. HessIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Fayetteville Street Railway v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API