Legal Opinion

Abbott v. New York & New England Railroad

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 4, 1888PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.

The first two cases are actions of tort in two counts, one in trespass, the other alleging the obstruction of a right of way. The alleged trespass consists of the use of a strip of land, five rods wide, by the defendant for its road across the farm of each of the plaintiffs, and is admitted, unless the defendant has a valid location under the statutes of this State. The other count is of less importance, and will be referred to later.

The defendant is the successor of the Boston, Hartford, and Erie Railroad Company, St. 1873, o. 289, and the location *451principally relied on is a location five…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Clark v. BarnardSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  2. Kohl v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Van Brocklin v. TennesseeSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Galveston Railroad v. CowdreySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  5. Gilmer v. ThrockmortonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Lancey v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Southern Illinois & Missouri Bridge Co. v. StoneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  3. Capreal, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Harrison v. DolanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  5. Weeks v. GraceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API