Legal Opinion
Spilsbury v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 10, 2004No. CIV.A.02-0374 EGSPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are disabled children who are eligible for special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2003). Defendants are the District of Columbia; the Superintendent of District of Columbia Public Schools; the Assistant Superintendent of District of Columbia Public Schools, Anne Gay; and the Director of Policy and Planning for District of Columbia Public Schools, Judith Smith, Esq. Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross motions for summary judgment. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Waterhouse v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Rhoads v. McFerranCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Board Of Education Of Community High School District No. 218 v. Illinois State Board Of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- D.K. Ex Rel. Klein v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Peak v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Alston v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Alfonso v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Johnson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.