Legal Opinion
Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Mascali-Robke Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 10, 1955PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Isidor Wasservogel,
Special Eeferee. Plaintiffs seek to recover the sum of $4,912.19, which allegedly represents the balance of premiums due plaintiffs from defendant pursuant to the provisions of a workmen’s compensation insurance policy which was duly issued to defendants on or about July 2, 1943.
Defendant is a parent corporation for several business ventures which were referred to during the trial of this action as the “ Mascali Enterprises.” Defendant hired labor and supplied the payroll for all the companies which comprised the ‘‘ Mascali Enterprises ” throughout the period here involved.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Employers Liability Assurance Co. v. Success Uncle Sam Cone Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1925
- Employees' Liability Assurance Corp. of London v. Hayes Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Sadigur v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
- Andrews v. GoodmanCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936
- Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. BlankNew York Supreme Court · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. Kenneth Yesmont & Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. Fox Run Farms, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Employers Mutual Liability Insurance of Wisconsin v. BromleyNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Mascali-Robke Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1956
- Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. RegenstreifAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1960
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.