Legal Opinion

Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Regenstreif

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided December 1, 1960PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The partial defenses alleged by defendants in resistance of plaintiffs’ claim involve the correctness and propriety of payroll rates and classifications assigned to defendants’ employees and cannot be raised until defendants exhaust the mandatory administrative procedure to be followed by an assured in contesting rates and classifications. (See Commissioners of State Ins. Fund v. Mascali-Robke, 208 Misc. 316, affd. 1 A D 2d 945; Commissioners of State Ins. Fund v. Blank, 205 Misc. 322; Commissioners of State Ins. Fund v. Sealand Corp., 13 Misc 2d 745; Matter of General Mut. Ins. Co. v. Mutual…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Mascali-Robke Co.New York Supreme Court · 1955
  2. General Mutual Insurance v. Mutual Insurance Rating BureauNew York Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Commissioners of State Insurance Fund v. BlankNew York Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Commissioners of the State Insurance Fund v. Sealand Marine & Maintenance Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American Home Assurance Co. v. Phineas Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2004
  2. Investors Insurance Co. of America v. Karbel Wholesale Autos, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API