Legal Opinion

Delorme v. North Dakota Department of Human Services

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 1992No. Civ. 920062PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Justice.

The North Dakota Department of Human Services [“the Department”] appeals from a district court judgment reversing the Department’s order terminating child care reimbursement benefits to Mary Jane Delorme. We reverse the judgment of the district court.

Pursuant to a tribal court order, Mary Jane Delorme has had custody of her 3 year old grandson, Simon, since shortly after his birth. Prior to February 1991 De-lorme received Aid to Families with Dependent Children [AFDC] benefits of $108 per month and child care reimbursement of $175 per month on behalf of Simon. Because Delorme…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Clarke v. Securities Industry Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. StateMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  2. North Dakota Fair Housing Council, Inc. v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. In the Interest of K.E.N. ex rel. Shasky v. R.C.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Hickey v. North Dakota Department of Health & Consolidated LaboratoriesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Birst v. SansteadNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API