Legal Opinion

President of Connersville v. Bank of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 28, 1861PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Fayette Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Guriam.

The Bank, a branch of the Bank of the State, sued the Town of Oonnersmlle on town orders. The town answered, setting up taxes alleged to be due from the bank to the town.

Trial by the Court; the set-off disallowed; and judgment for the bank.

The case is here upon the evidence. We think the judgment below was right. The taxes alleged to be due the town were assessed upon the money and notes on hand of the bank. .

By the charter, the capital stock of the bank is not taxable for municipal purposes. The capital stock consists originally of the money paid in by the subscribers to the stock…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Comm'rs of Ottawa Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. King v. City of MadisonIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  3. Union Trust Co. v. RadfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Craft v. TuttleIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
  5. Stiltz v. TutewilerIndiana Superior Court · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API