Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vinci v. Ford Motor Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 13, 2007Published

1Dissent

Sullivan, J.P., and Buckley, J.,

dissent in part in a memorandum by Buckley, J., as follows: I agree that the trial court properly exercised its discretion in admitting defendant’s crash test reenacting the accident in this products liability case. Evidence of experiments is properly admissible so long as the proponent establishes a substantial similarity between the conditions under which the experiments were conducted and the conditions at the time of the accident, particularly where the opponent has an unrestricted opportunity to cross-examine (see Styles v General Motors Corp., 20 AD3d…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Uss v. Town of Oyster BayNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Styles v. General Motors Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Frias v. FanningAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  4. Eisner v. Daitch Crystal Dairies, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  5. Herrera v. V.B. Haulage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API