Legal Opinion

Frias v. Fanning

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 28, 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— In a negligence action to recover dam*797ages for wrongful death and conscious pain and suffering, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Scholnick, J.), dated July 23, 1984, as, upon a jury verdict, is in favor of the defendants Timothy Fanning, Fergas Tomlin sued herein as Forlan Fergas and Ansel Productions, Inc., and against them.

Judgment affirmed insofar as appealed from, without costs or disbursements.

The decedent died as a result of injuries sustained in a head-on collision between his bicycle and the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Martin v. HerzogNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Curry v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Ankersmit v. . TuchNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  4. Ortiz v. Kinoshita & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  5. Seguin v. BergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tepoz v. SosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Bertan v. Richmond Memorial Hospital & Health CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Leffler v. FeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  4. Dawe v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. Pullo v. SternAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API