Legal Opinion

Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 7, 1994PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RODGERS, Senior Judge.

Irwin A. Popowsky and the Office of Consumer Advocate (OCA) petition for review of the order of the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC or Commission) allowing Pennsylvania-American Water Company (PAWC or the Company), intervenor, an increase in rates which included, over OCA’s objections, approval of the Company’s claim for recovery of expenses incurred in providing benefits other than pensions to retired employees (OPEBs), i.e., health care and life insurance benefits.

In July 1992, PAWC filed with the Commission a tariff supplement designed to produce an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Philadelphia Electric Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Pike County Light & Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  4. Columbia Gas of Pennsylvania, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. West Penn Power Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. Public Advocate v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  3. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Popowsky v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API