Legal Opinion · Dissent

Alabama Legislative Black Caucus v. Alabama

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided December 20, 2013No. Case Nos. 2:12-CV-691, 2:12-CV-1081Published

1DissentThompson, District Judge

In these two cases, the Alabama Legislative Black Caucus, various elected black officials, and others challenge the redistricting plans for the Alabama House and Senate. Specifically, they challenge each majority-black House and Senate District in addition to Senate Districts 7,11 and 22. Despite the multiplicity of claims and responses in this litigation, in my view the two cases are actually quite simple. As explained below, the drafters of these plans labored under the false belief that § 5 of the Voting Rights Act (“VRA”), 42 *1313U.S.C. § 1973c, required them to adopt for each majority-black…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. PenaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Hunt v. CromartieSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API