Legal Opinion
Puppe Ex Rel. Puppe v. A.C. & S., Inc.
District Court, D. North Dakota
Decided March 28, 1990No. Civ. A2-86-78PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VAN SICKLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On March 15, 1990 defendants GAF Corporation; National Gypsum Company; Pfizer, Inc.; Union Carbide Corporation; and United States Gypsum Company filed a motion with this Court. Defendants requested that this Court “exclude any potential claim made by plaintiffs for punitive damages.... ” Several letters have been filed by defendants American Hoist and Derrick Company (now Amdura); and Clark Equipment Company. In their letters, these defendants ask to join in the motion to exclude “any potential claim by plaintiff for punitive…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ferguson v. SkrupaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Browning-Ferris Industries of Vermont, Inc. v. Kelco Disposal, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- WR Grace & Co.-Conn. v. WatersSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
- Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996