Legal Opinion

City of Alma v. Indiana Air-Pump Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 18, 1931No. 20556Published

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Since a municipality may, through its governing authority, legally incur an obligation payable within the current year, provided a provision for payment is made by a tax levy for the year, and since public officers presumably perform their duties, a contract made by the governing authority of a city for the purchase of an air-pump outfit for the city to be paid for within the current year is, without more, presumably a legally authorized obligation of the city. The following cases are distinguishable: Mayor &c. of Dawson v. Dawson Waterworks Co., 102 Ga. 594 (29 S. E. 755) ; Wiley v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wiley v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Eureka Fire Hose Manufacturing Co. v. Mayor of EastmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. Citizens Bank v. Town of LudowiciCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919
  4. Mayor of Dawson v. Dawson Waterworks Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API