Legal Opinion

Grievance Committee for the Southern District of New York v. Sam Polur

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided September 20, 1995No. 3, Docket 94-7144PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Per curiam

Respondent Sam Polur, an attorney who has been suspended from the practice of law in the State of New York (“State”), appeals from an order entered by the Grievance Committee of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“the Grievance Committee” or “Committee”) suspending him from practice in the Southern District until such time as he is reinstated to the practice of law in the State. On appeal, Polur contends principally that the Grievance Committee violated his right to due process by failing to provide him with timely notice of the institution of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Greene v. LindseySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Josephine Weigner v. The City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
  4. In re PolurAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Oneida Indian Nation v. Madison CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. New York State National Organization for Women v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Perez-ValderaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
  4. Oneida Indian Nation of NY v. Madison CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  5. (PC) Johnson v. Sacramento County Sheriff's OfficeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API