Legal Opinion

State v. Turner

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 21, 1899PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Criminal Court. — HoN. D. W. , Shacexeeobd, Special Judge. An examination of tbe authorities regarding tbe sufficiency of tbe count in tbe indictment upon wbicb tbe defendant was convicted will disclose nothing irregular or illegal.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Jackson Criminal Court. — HoN. D. W. , Shacexeeobd, Special Judge. An examination of tbe authorities regarding tbe sufficiency of tbe count in tbe indictment upon wbicb tbe defendant was convicted will disclose nothing irregular or illegal. It is in due form and has been frequently approved by this court., State v. Myers, 82 Mo. 562; State v. Wammack, 70 Mo. 410; State v. Ward, 74 ,Mo. 253; State v. Riley, 100 Mo. 494;. State v. Smith, 80 Mo. 516; State v. Nelson, 101 Mo. 477;. State v. Bibb, 69 Mo. 286; State v. Warren, 104 Mo. 432; State v. Harl, 137 Mo. 253; State v. Allen, 116…

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, J.

No bill of exceptions in this case,, and defendant convicted under tbe second count of tbe indictment and bis punishment assessed at five years in tbe penitentiary.

Tbe second count referred to, is tbe following:

“And tbe grand jurors aforesaid, upon their oaths aforesaid, do further say and present that R. B. Turner, at tbe county of Jackson and State of Missouri, on tbe 23rd day of" December, 1895, unlawfully and feloniously did have in bis possession and custody a certain false, forged and counterfeit check purporting to be made by tbe Hudson-Nimberly Publishing Company, a corporation duly…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ToombsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
  2. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1914
  3. State v. JettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API