Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 18, 1914No. A-2026PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from County Court, Logan County; A. H. Huston, Judge. Walter Williams was convicted of forgery in the second degree, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.

Plaintiff in error, Walter Williams, was convicted at the January, 1913, term of the district court of Logan county on a charge of forgery in the second degree, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a period of two years. The information charged the accused with having possession of a forged deed with intent, upon the part of. the accused, to injure and defraud by uttering the same as true, the charging part of the information being as follows:

“* * * Unlawfully, willfully, knowingly, feloniously and falsely have in his possession a certain forged and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wishard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Bowlegs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Lockard v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  4. Haskins v. RalstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Ellington v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Burns v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1941
  2. Raybourn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1958
  3. Strong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930
  4. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API