Legal Opinion

Scott v. Gillespie

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 9, 1918No. 21,919PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Morris district court; Roswell L. King, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

The trustee in bankruptcy of the estate of Oliver. R. Gillespie brought this suit to have construed the will of Oliver’s father, alleging that the bankrupt was owner of a tenth interest in the land covered by the will, which interest should be counted a part of his estate on account of his *746mother’s having taken a life estate with power to sell, instead of a fee simple title as claimed by the defendants; and that he had been ordered by the referee in bankruptcy to bring this suit in order to determine the proper interpretation of the instrument.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Bryant v. FlannerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  3. Postlethwaite v. EdsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Thompson v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Stumpf v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  3. Markham v. WatermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  4. Zabel v. StewartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Dyal v. BruntSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API