Legal Opinion

State v. . Thornton

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1852PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The motion, made in the court below, and upon which the case is brought here, is founded upon a misconception of the principle and effect of a nol. pros. entered by the prosecuting officer on an indictment. A bill of indictment was found against the defendant, and anolle prosequi was entered by the Attorney-General, and an alias capias was issued against the defendant, under which he entered into a recognizance to appear at the succeeding term. No other bill upon the same charge was sent to the grand jury, and the Attorney-General announced his determination to send no other, but to try the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wilkinson v. . WilkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  2. State v. . TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. State v. . SwepsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  4. State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  5. State v. Smith.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API