Legal Opinion

Rogers v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 1, 1926No. A-5277PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBessey, P. J.

Plaintiff in error, R. L. Rogers, here designated the defendant, was convicted of a cumulative or second offense against the prohibitory liquor laws of this state — in this instance manufacturing whisky — with his punishment fixed at confinement in the penitentiary for a term of one year, and to pay a fine of $500.

The charging part of the information reads as follows:

“R. L. Rogers * * * did commit the crime of felonious manufacture of intoxicating liquor, in the manner and form as follows, to wit: He, the said R. L. Rogers, on or about January 11, 1919, was duly charged by information in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Tucker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Browder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Furrh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1924

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Spann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
  2. Hunter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1962
  3. McHenry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1937
  4. Bassett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929
  5. Johnston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1930

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API