Legal Opinion
Tucker v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 22, 1917No. A-2292PublishedCited by 32 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Grady County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge. Art Tucker was convicted of violating the prohibitory liquor law, and appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
The plaintiff in error, Art Tucker, was convicted in the district court of Grady county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the state penitentiary for a term of five years. The charging part of the information upon which the conviction is based is as follows:
“That on or about said day and date and in said county and state the said Art Tucker and John Tucker, then and there being, did then and there willfully, unlawfully, and feloniously have and keep in their possession certain intoxicating…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Kring v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- McDonald v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Moore v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Hartung v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Massey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1922
- People v. BiggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- Mason v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1956
- Spann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1940
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.