Legal Opinion

United States v. Peter S. Dimas and Ramon Roman

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided August 18, 1993No. 92-2975, 92-2976, 93-1688 and 93-1884PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Per curiam

A jury convicted the defendants of various drug offenses. These consolidated appeals challenge those convictions on three grounds. Two of the grounds lack merit. However, the record is insufficient for us. to review the third, which concerns the denial of a motion for a new trial, so we vacate that ruling and remand for an evidentiary hearing limited to that issue.

I

On April 23,1991, Peter Dimas and Ramon Roman were caught selling a kilogram of cocaine to an undercover DEA agent. They were indicted on charges of conspiracy, possession with intent to distribute, and distribution of a controlled…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Pennsylvania v. RitchieSupreme Court of the United States · 1987

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. United States v. Jeff BoydCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Benjamin Harold Brooks and Frederick James TreeshCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Wieslaw MietusCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Edward L. Morris and Steven M. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Randy Boss and Revell Boss v. Guy Pierce and Mark A. PiersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API