Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Gomez v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided September 5, 2007No. F-2005-526Published

1Concurrence

LUMPKIN, Presiding Judge:

Special Concur.

T1 I concur in Judge Arlene Johnson's well reasoned application of this Court's jurisprudence relating to the warrantless search of an automobile. I write separately to address further the history of this jurisprudence.

T2 The relationship between Article II, § 830 of the Oklahoma Constitution and the Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution was decided just two years after statehood. In DeGraff v. State, 1909 OK CR 82, 2 Okla.Crim. 519, 103 P. 588 this Court said:

This provision of our Constitution [Article II Section 80] is almost an exact…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Maryland v. DysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  5. Pennsylvania v. LabronSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API