Legal Opinion

Cissy Chantel Russell v. Rabecka Lynn Grossman and Kelly Pauline Gartin

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided September 22, 2026No. 1:23-cv-00405Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA FORT WAYNE DIVISION CISSY CHANTEL RUSSELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ) Case No.: 1:23-cv-405 ) v. ) ) RABECKA LYNN GROSSMAN and ) KELLY PAULINE GARTIN, ) ) Defendants. ) OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the court on the Motion for Summary Judgment [DE 108] filed by Defendant Kelly Pauline Gartin. Plaintiff filed a Response [DE 112]. Defendant filed a Reply [DE 114]. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to File a Surreply [DE 115]. In the interest of justice, the court GRANTS the Motion for Leave [DE 115] and will consider Plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Wheeler v. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. Nichols v. Michigan City Plant Planning DepartmentCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API