Legal Opinion
Prince v. Arkansas Board of Examiners in Psychology
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided August 17, 2004No. 03-3524PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WOLLMAN, Circuit Judge.
Michael Prince, Ph.D., appeals from the district court’s 1 dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. We affirm. 2
I
Dr. Prince, a licensed psychologist in' Arkansas, faced ethics charges before the Arkansas Board of Examiners in Psychology (the Board) for his use of non-licensed testing technicians to administer psychological tests contrary to ethical standards established by the Board. The Board has authority over the licensing and discipline of Arkansas psychologists. Ark.Code. Ann. § 17-97-310 & 311 (1999). The Board charged Prince…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Porter v. NussleSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Verizon Maryland Inc. v. Public Service Commission of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Johnson v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Prince v. the Arkansas Board of Examiners in PsychologyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004