Noyes v. Grossmont Union High School District
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER RE: SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS
LORENZ, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Lisa Noyes’ Motion for Summary Judgment or in the Alternative, Summary Adjudication, and Defendant Grossmont Union High School District’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The Court finds these motions suitable for determination on the papers submitted and without oral argument in accordance with Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1).
Plaintiff filed this action seeking attorney’s fees under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq. (“IDEA”), and now moves for an award of…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Stokes v. Saga International Holidays, Ltd.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2005
- Mara Aguirre v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Jones v. Wild Oats Markets, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2006
- Aguirre v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Aguirre v. Los Angeles Unified School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.